<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Black and White Forum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blackwhiteforum.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blackwhiteforum.com</link>
	<description>Objective truth is black or white</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 21:49:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Role of Danger in Divorce</title>
		<link>http://blackwhiteforum.com/2011/11/the-role-of-danger-in-divorce/</link>
		<comments>http://blackwhiteforum.com/2011/11/the-role-of-danger-in-divorce/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 21:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>B&#38;W Forum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Christian Living]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bible]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackwhiteforum.com/?p=225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Concerning the answer for the Divorce question:  Danger isn&#8217;t in the Scriptures that were used to answer the question.  Therefore why it is being implied?  Please cite a specific verse.&#8221; The first thing that we need to emphasize is that God highly esteems marriage and even though He permits divorce and remarriage under certain circumstances [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Concerning the answer for the Divorce question:  Danger isn&#8217;t in the Scriptures that were used to answer the question.  Therefore why it is being implied?  Please cite a specific verse.&#8221;</p>
<p>The first thing that we need to emphasize is that God highly esteems marriage and even though He permits divorce and remarriage under certain circumstances His word carefully guards against any frivolous reason for ending a marriage, including ending a marriage with the possibility of remarriage.</p>
<p>This is why, in Matthew 19:3 the Pharisees came to Jesus with a hidden agenda and asked Him “Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for just any reason?”</p>
<p>This question can be traced back to Deuteronomy 24:1.  In Jesus’ day the readers were interpreting this “uncleanness” (Heb. ervah-sexual shame) as anything from their wives raising their voices to burning dinner.  So Jesus was quick and clear with His response.  He said in Matt.19:9 “And I say to you, whosoever divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality”.  That was Jesus’ commentary on ‘ervah’ back in Deut.21.</p>
<p>So it is clear that DISLOYALTY is a biblically recognized reason for divorce and remarriage.  (According to Matt. 19;9 a person would not be committing adultery if they remarried. Mark 10 also talks about this including the woman’s perspective.)</p>
<p>Romans 7 and 1Corinthians 7 both talk about DEATH as a situation that ends the “bond” of marriage (“released from the law of her husband”) from God’s perspective (1Cor 7:39).</p>
<p>1 Corinthians 7:15 says “But if the unbeliever departs, let him depart, a brother or sister is not <em>under bondage </em>in such cases.”  So that answers the question of DESERTION.</p>
<p><strong>Now how about DANGER?  Would God comment at all about the marriage status of a woman who was being beaten everyday by her husband?  Would he care about the knocked out teeth, scull fractures, acid burns, slashed faces, children in the home placed in peril because of this husbands “friends” who may be abusing them on routine bases?  This is the reality for some women in America and certainly globally, where often laws protecting woman are much less vague or strictly enforced.</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>So where would God talk about that?  Is there a chapter, a verse?  Ever notice how Paul in 1 Cor 7 while talking about marriage repeatedly says, “Now to the married I command, yet not I but the Lord.” Or, “But to the rest I, not the Lord, say”.  Or “Now to the married I command, yet not I but the Lord.”  The reason why Paul says this is because marriage is such a complicated issue. <strong> It is really impossible to list all of the individual and specific scenarios and problems.  That is the purpose of 1 Corinthians 7:10-11.  It is obviously a more general instruction, and might be considered something like a “protection of woman clause”.  And its requirements are tough.</strong></p>
<p>Verse 10 “A wife is not to depart from her husband.”  Verse 11 “But even if she does depart.”  Now the next thing you would expect to read would be something like. “but even if she does depart, she has done wrong!”  But it doesn’t say that, the passage says, “<strong>But even if she does depart, let her remain unmarried.</strong>”  So for whatever reason this “departing” represents, while the built in consequences are tough (remain unmarried), there is no condemnation for this action by the woman.  The only other thing that Paul says is, “or be reconciled to her husband”.  This is the protection clause for any woman in a marriage relationship.  <strong>If there is a situation that is serious and legitimate where she determines that she must “depart” (like the DANGEROUS situations I mentioned above) she can end the marriage, but she cannot just find someone else.  There is provision built in for some hope for the relationship (some reconciliation), if conditions improve, at lease as long as the man remains alive.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blackwhiteforum.com/2011/11/the-role-of-danger-in-divorce/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If Jesus forgave all sins, should we ask for forgiveness?</title>
		<link>http://blackwhiteforum.com/2011/08/if-jesus-forgave-all-sins-should-we-ask-for-forgiveness/</link>
		<comments>http://blackwhiteforum.com/2011/08/if-jesus-forgave-all-sins-should-we-ask-for-forgiveness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 14:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>B&#38;W Forum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Christian Living]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jesus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bible]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackwhiteforum.com/?p=222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jesus forgave all our sins, but why do we still have to ask for forgiveness? If we confess our sins, He is faithful and righteous to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. I John 1:9 The answer to this question lies in a proper understanding of 2 things: God’s desire [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jesus forgave all our sins, but why do we still have to ask for forgiveness?</strong></p>
<p><em>If we confess our sins, He is faithful and righteous to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. I John 1:9</em></p>
<p>The<em> </em>answer to this question lies in a proper understanding of 2 things:</p>
<ol>
<li>God’s desire for reconciliation with mankind</li>
<li>Our health throughout our relationship with Christ as Lord and Savior</li>
</ol>
<p>Because of our sin, we are positionally disconnected from God before we place our trust in Christ. Once we have made a commitment to God, through repentance and faith, we enter into a righteous standing with God because of Jesus’ work on our behalf. This means that we cannot be made positionally unrighteous again because we have accepted Christ’s sacrifice as sufficient.</p>
<p>After we have made this commitment though, John talks about the importance of still confessing our sins to God (remember Christ modeled this as well in Matthew 6:9-13). John says <em>If we confess our sins, He is faithful and righteous to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness</em>. This is teaching us two things about the importance of confession of sin as a Christian:</p>
<ol>
<li>The first is that it speaks to us as a reminder that we are still sinful and in need of God’s grace and forgiveness.</li>
<li>The second thing it does is help maintain a level of health in our relationship with God. The relationship exists already because of our acceptance of Christ’s work on the cross, but the relationship keeps a level of healthiness through a continuous process of confession of our sins and a continuous forgiveness from Jesus.</li>
</ol>
<p>Think of it this way: I have entered in a marriage covenant with my wife where we have agreed to love one another through sickness, health, poverty and wealth. Those vows mean that my wife and I are in a relationship where we have committed to sticking it out no matter what happens (similar to the commitment that God makes to us). Now, if I sin against my wife in some way, shape or form, she and I are still committed to one another through our marriage vows, BUT it is still wise to confess my sin to her and ask for her forgiveness so that we can maintain healthy trust and communication with one another. In the same way, when we sin against God, we cannot destroy the covenant, but confession does assist in the healthy communication of our relationship with God.</p>
<p>Grace and Peace!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blackwhiteforum.com/2011/08/if-jesus-forgave-all-sins-should-we-ask-for-forgiveness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why is it translated &#8220;speaking in tongues&#8221; when we don&#8217;t do that now?</title>
		<link>http://blackwhiteforum.com/2011/06/why-is-it-translated-speaking-in-tongues-when-we-dont-do-that-now/</link>
		<comments>http://blackwhiteforum.com/2011/06/why-is-it-translated-speaking-in-tongues-when-we-dont-do-that-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>B&#38;W Forum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Christian Living]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Church]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackwhiteforum.com/?p=217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is of first importance to study the words behind our English translations, within the biblical texts and to understand their historical meaning and usage. Within the New Testament we see two words employed for which our English translations translate as speaking in tongues. The first being xenoglossia, which can be defined as a miraculous [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is of first importance to study the words behind our English translations, within the biblical texts and to understand their historical meaning and usage. Within the New Testament we see two words employed for which our English translations translate as speaking in tongues. The first being <em>xenoglossia</em>, which can be defined as a miraculous ability to spontaneously speak a foreign language without previous fluency, we see this word employed by Luke in his book the Acts of the Apostles in his account of Pentecost (Acts 2:4). The second being<em> </em>which can be defined as indistinguishable verbal utterances produced under a special movement of the Holy Spirit and classified as a prayer language (Romans 8:6), we see this gift and its proper practice discussed by the Apostle Paul in his First Letter to the Corinthians (1 Corinthians 14:5-29).</p>
<p>Of second importance no where in Scripture do we see any Apostolic authority establishing that the provocation of any of the above movements of the Holy Spirit would cease after an established period of time (although we know that they will not last forever, 1 Corinthians 13:8) or be isolated to any particular geographic location (Jerusalem, Ephesus, Corinth, etc.) this biblical fact does not lend itself to support a secession of the gifts (including and not limited to speaking in tongues) at the conclusion of the Apostolic age nor does a simple absence of biblical proof against their continuation prove that these gifts are still being expressed through the faithful today.</p>
<p><strong> The Bottom line is that we should never read the Scripture based on any preconceived notions lest we impose on the text and therefore dishonor it</strong>. What is of true importance when trying to understand the gift of speaking in tongues or any Spiritual gift is that every gift is dispensed by God’s grace (1 Corinthians 12:27-31) and not by man’s will (Hebrews 2:4), that they are dispensed by God for the personal and communal edification of believers, and that any gift bestowed upon a believer needs to be handled with propriety and practiced biblically under the instruction of the Scriptures.</p>
<p><em>For a detailed understanding of the use and practice of speaking in tongues please read 1 Corinthians 14:5-29.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blackwhiteforum.com/2011/06/why-is-it-translated-speaking-in-tongues-when-we-dont-do-that-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did God Create Evil to Corrupt His Perfect Creation?</title>
		<link>http://blackwhiteforum.com/2010/11/did-god-create-evil-to-corrupt-his-perfect-creation/</link>
		<comments>http://blackwhiteforum.com/2010/11/did-god-create-evil-to-corrupt-his-perfect-creation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 17:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>B&#38;W Forum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Creation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bible]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackwhiteforum.com/?p=210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If God knows it all and created all, why would he create an evil spirit (Satan) that would corrupt his perfect creation? This question is one of both deep philosophical and theological investigation, and it’s one that’s surfaced countless times over the history of those two disciplines.  We’ll hardly pretend to have the lynchpin answer [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>If God knows it all and created all, why would he create an evil spirit (Satan) that would corrupt his perfect creation?</h2>
<p>This question is one of both deep philosophical and theological investigation, and it’s one that’s surfaced countless times over the history of those two disciplines.  We’ll hardly pretend to have the lynchpin answer for this ongoing conversation, and with that in mind, let’s begin by making several observations about God’s initial act of creation here at the outset. </p>
<p>First, when Satan was created, he was not created as “an evil spirit.”  1 John 3:4 tells us that <strong><em>“God is light, and in him is no darkness at all.”</em></strong>  Everything that God created, including the host of angels of whom Satan was a member, were created without sin.  The Bible is clear that God is incapable of producing evil.</p>
<p> Second, just as God is a being with personal volition, angels (and Satan) were created with a freedom of choice.  In Isaiah 14:12, Satan is said to have spoken the words: <strong><em>‘I will ascend to heaven; I will raise my throne above the stars of God, and I will sit on the mount of assembly in the recesses of the north.  ‘I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will make myself like the Most High.’</em></strong>[1]  Satan made the unmitigated decision to oppose God by use of his freedom, distorting a gift which God meant for holy purposes, into something that would cause colossal damage to himself, and eventually humanity.</p>
<p> Third, it’s certain that God knew how the events proceeding the fall of man would come about.  Isaiah 40:28 tells us that <strong><em>“The Lord is the everlasting God, the Creator of the ends of the earth.  He does not faint or grow weary; his understanding is unsearchable.”</em></strong>  God’s understanding exceeds the limits of human comprehension.  He was not surprised by Satan’s rebellion, or his instigation of humanity to rebel.</p>
<p> In the end, no matter how well the question is clarified, we will ultimately end with the question of, “why did God create things in the way that He did?”  It’s here that we begin to tread some heavily philosophical terrain; because if God is omnipotent and wholly good, then the world as He initially created it was the best possible world which could have been created. </p>
<p> When Jesus tells us that <em><strong>“True worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and truth, for the Father is <span style="text-decoration: underline;">seeking</span> such people to worship him</strong>,” </em>[2] this is because God is not <strong>coercing</strong> us to worship Him.  To force us to love Him would make God anything but good or loving; He would then be a tyrant unworthy of worship.  It is the highest definition of love that two freely acting persons should give themselves to one another, and this is what God made possible by creating the world in the manner He did.  For us to wish for a world with no evil, is to wish for a world of not <em>more</em> abundant love, but less.</p>
<p> No one hates <strong><em>or suffers from</em></strong> evil more than God Himself.  Yet he was willing to endure it all (even to the culmination of all evil in His Son’s murder), so that He might seek and find those who would love Him without coercion, and eventually give them the object of all their desire when they love Him freely, and spend their eternities with Him in His coming glory.</p>
<p> ________________________</p>
<p>[1] This passage has historically been cited as a double reference to both Satan and the King of Babylon who states the same about his own earthly kingdom, though not all scholars agree with this application.</p>
<p>[2] John 4:23</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blackwhiteforum.com/2010/11/did-god-create-evil-to-corrupt-his-perfect-creation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Does Biblical Femininity Look Like?</title>
		<link>http://blackwhiteforum.com/2010/10/what-does-biblical-femininity-look-like/</link>
		<comments>http://blackwhiteforum.com/2010/10/what-does-biblical-femininity-look-like/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 20:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>B&#38;W Forum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Christian Living]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[God]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackwhiteforum.com/?p=205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Keeping the Bible in mind as much as possible how would you define femininity?  I am especially curious about femininity as a single woman.  There seems to be numerous verses on how to be a good wife and mother but very few on how to honor God through your femininity if you are single. God [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Keeping the Bible in mind as much as possible how would you define femininity?  I am especially curious about femininity as a single woman.  There seems to be numerous verses on how to be a good wife and mother but very few on how to honor God through your femininity if you are single.</h2>
<p>God has given us His Word as a guide for our lives, so of course He would give us an example of what godly feminity looks like, single or married, children or no children, divorced or widowed.</p>
<p>The first passage that comes to mind would be Titus 2. Titus is a book on conduct, the way we ought to live as models of christian living.Verse 5 says, <em><strong>&#8220;This instruction is so that the Word of God may not be dishonored,&#8221;</strong></em> and verse 8, <strong><em>&#8220;So that the opponent may be put to shame, having nothing bad to say about us.&#8221;</em></strong> Verse 10,<em><strong> &#8220;So that we may adorn the doctrine of God our Savior in every respect.&#8221;</strong></em> And we see in verse 11, &#8220;<em><strong>God&#8217;s grace has appeared, bringing salvation to all men.&#8221; </strong></em>It is through our conduct, our obedience to the Word of God that the opponent is put to shame and God&#8217;s salvation is brought to people.</p>
<p>John MacArthur says, <em>&#8220;If the saving grace of Christ is to reach all men, it&#8217;s going to depend on the character of the church. If we honor the Word, silence the critics and demonstrate that God is a saving God by our transformed lives, then the gospel will be powerfully effective.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>In Titus 2 we are given very specific roles and responsibilities, a job description if you will. We see there are instructions for older men, younger men, older women and younger women. The phrase &#8216;older women,&#8217; refers to women who are past child bearing/child rearing age which during that time, a time of no birth control, women could be having children late into their forties and thus rearing them until their teenage years which means &#8216;older women&#8217; are those probably above the age of 60. So, I will assume that you are among the &#8216;younger women&#8217; in that passage and although it does include responsibilities for both a wife and a mother, it also includes other helpful information for living a life that is pleasing to God as a woman who is single or not. <em><strong>&#8216;so that they may encourage the young women to love their husbands, to love their children, to be sensible, pure, workers at home, kind, being subject to their own husbands, so that the word of God will not be dishonored. to be sensible, pure, workers at home, kind, being subject to their own husbands, so that the word of God will not be dishonored.&#8217;<br />
</strong><strong><br />
sensible &#8211; </strong></em>to have sound judgment, common sense, right thinking, right priorities, very basic. (i.e. knowing your priorities, thinking right and applying wisdom.)<br />
<em><strong>pure -</strong></em> morally pure, virtuous, sexually faithful to their husband (or if they are single, to their future husband.) In 1 Timothy 2, you see the words <em><strong>&#8220;modestly and discreetly,&#8221;</strong></em> that there is thought behind your actions, your dress, your words, and that thought is: &#8220;I never have intentions of distracting someone from worshiping God or potentially causing another believer to sin.&#8221;<br />
<em><strong>kind &#8211; </strong></em>gentle, tender-hearted, merciful, thoughtful<br />
<em><strong><br />
</strong></em>A perfect Biblical example of those characteristics would be Ruth. Ruth was a widow, but single nonetheless so studying her life is a great way to see how God desires a single woman to honor Him.</p>
<p>Ruth was loyal, sacrificial and selfless (she gave up EVERYTHING to follow after God &#8211; what do we need to give up in order to follow whole-heartedly after God?), she is a woman of action, a hard worker, responsible and diligent (she would have had to get up early in the morning and would have worked in the fields all day in the heat&#8230;), she wasn&#8217;t looking for hand outs and was willing to do whatever it would take to make sure that those she loved (Naomi &#8211; mother-in-law) were taken care of, she made no excuses, we never see her complain about her situation which was devastatingly bad from a world&#8217;s perspective, a giver (2:18), through her suffering she maintained emotional stability and made good decisions (especially important with women and our tendency to run off of emotions), she is a risk-taker (chapter 3), respectful: seeks the advise of an older, wiser follower of God and heeds her advice, she is sweet, tender, gentle, we see her patiently seeking God, waiting, listening to and loving God, she has integrity and character (3:10 &#8211; she could have had any guy she wanted), she had a great reputation (3:11 &#8211; people knew who she was and were in awe of how she was sacrificially, selflessly living; so much so that they were talking about it)&#8230; most importantly we see from the very beginning and throughout the book, Ruth&#8217;s love and pursuit of God <em><strong>&#8220;Your people shall be my people, and your God, my God.&#8221; </strong></em><br />
<em><strong><br />
</strong></em>1 Peter 3 says<em><strong> &#8216;but you worry about the hidden person of the heart with the imperishable quality of a gentle and quiet spirit, precious in the sight of God, for in this way in former times, the holy women also used to adorn themselves.&#8217;</strong></em><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>Focus on your pursuit of God, of becoming more like Christ rather than the external, rather than what the world and our culture tells us what defines and makes up a woman, what we should act like, look like. Look to the Bible for your answers to those questions, not the world, and you will no doubt be molded into exactly who God wants you to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blackwhiteforum.com/2010/10/what-does-biblical-femininity-look-like/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Is The Biblical Meaning Of Speaking In Tongues?</title>
		<link>http://blackwhiteforum.com/2010/08/what-is-the-biblical-meaning-of-speaking-in-tongues/</link>
		<comments>http://blackwhiteforum.com/2010/08/what-is-the-biblical-meaning-of-speaking-in-tongues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>B&#38;W Forum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Christian Living]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bible]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackwhiteforum.com/?p=197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Q. What is the Biblical meaning of speaking in tongues? Is it fruitful? Is it real when I hear people doing it or is it just babel? Spiritual gifts are for the edification of the church (1 cor 14:12). So any spiritual gift that is given is for the external manifestation of ministry to build [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Q. What is the Biblical meaning of speaking in tongues? Is it fruitful? Is it real when I hear people doing it or is it just babel?</h3>
<p>Spiritual gifts are for the edification of the church (1 cor 14:12). So any spiritual gift that is given is for the external manifestation of ministry to build the kingdom of God. We are all given spiritual gifts and we should not covet others&#8217; but pray to ask God to reveal our own so that we may serve our part in God&#8217;s design.</p>
<p>Ephesians 2:10 “For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand that we should walk in them. “</p>
<p>Gifts are given so that we may complete the work that God has given us. This is why we should not covet others&#8217; gifts, because each part has its own function and eternal end.</p>
<p>Speaking in tongues is a sign for unbelievers not believers (1 cor 14:22). <strong>The use of tongues biblically is always applied for the spirit to remove the language barrier between people so that those who do not speak the language may hear and understand the gospel.</strong> The perfect example of this is in Acts 2 at Pentecost. Many of the believers were in the upper room and they all started to speak in tongues, the direct effect of them speaking in tongues was that Jews from “every nation under heaven” heard the gospel in their native tongue/language.</p>
<p>Paul gives the tongues rule book in 1 Corinthians 14. First, tongues must be interpreted if it is in a church setting so the edification can come. Paul says in vs. 16, how can i say Amen, if i don’t know what was said. Also if an unbeliever walks into a service and hears the tongues without interpretation he would think everyone is crazy(vs.23). Tongues are not a spiritual aptitude to know that we are believers, we are all given spiritual gifts and it is in the manifestation of the fruits of the Spirit that we know believers, not in a specific gift.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blackwhiteforum.com/2010/08/what-is-the-biblical-meaning-of-speaking-in-tongues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If God Created Everything, Did He Create Evil?</title>
		<link>http://blackwhiteforum.com/2010/08/if-god-created-everything-did-he-create-evil/</link>
		<comments>http://blackwhiteforum.com/2010/08/if-god-created-everything-did-he-create-evil/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>B&#38;W Forum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Creation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bible]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackwhiteforum.com/?p=188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Q. How does the &#8220;problem of evil&#8221; resolve itself in the Christian faith?  If God created everything, does that mean He also created evil? When God created the heavens and the earth, everything He made was good (Genesis 1:31).  There was no trace of evil &#8211; no shortcoming in anything God had made. Our first [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><strong>Q. How does the &#8220;problem of evil&#8221; resolve itself in the Christian faith?  If God created everything, does that mean He also created evil?</strong></h3>
<div>
<div>
<p>When God created the heavens and the earth, everything He made was good (Genesis 1:31).  There was no trace of evil &#8211; no shortcoming in anything God had made.</p>
</div>
<div>Our first parents, Adam and Eve, enjoyed uninhibited communion with God in the garden He had given to them.  They loved Him of their own volition, and obeyed Him freely.  The Bible does not define exactly how long this continued, but at some point, evil entered this world through the lie of the serpent (Satan) to Eve.  By placing doubt into her mind as to whether God really meant what He said, he convinced her that she would be like God if she were to disobey Him.  She believed him, and ate of the only fruit in the garden which God strictly forbade.  Adam, being at her side, failed to protect her in her moment of temptation, and ate the fruit as well.  At this moment, Genesis tells us &#8220;their eyes were opened,&#8221; and they made coverings to hide their bodies (Genesis 3:7).</div>
<p><div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div>At the heart of the &#8220;problem of evil&#8221; is the element of <strong>human freedom</strong>.*  The Bible speaks often about role of human choice in believing and obeying him (Romans 1:18-23), and emphasizes the need for us to make a decision about whether we will follow him.  An objection which is often leveled against Christianity is that God is a cosmic tyrant who says &#8220;you do it my way, or no way at all.&#8221;  <strong>In reality,</strong> <strong>God has always given us two options: His or our own</strong>.  C. S. Lewis wrote that there are two types of people: There are those who kneel before God and say &#8220;thy will be done,&#8221; and those who refuse to bend their knee to Him, to whom God then says, &#8220;very well.  Thy will be done.&#8221;  <strong>Freedom to choose is a mark of humanness. </strong>As God chose to love us before we were born, so we, being made in His image and likeness, also have the choice to love Him.<strong> But He will not coerce us, and this is evidenced in the fact that even our first parents had the choice to believe God, or to believe the lie.</strong></div>
<div><strong><br />
</strong></div>
<div></div>
<div>The answer then, is that God created everything, including human freedom, and humanity chose to abuse this gift.  <strong>Thus He did not create evil, and He is not responsible for evil</strong>.  Evil is the result of human beings abusing the gift of free will<strong>.</strong> And free will, though it carries the capacity to be used for evil, is also the only way in which true love can exist.  If we did not have the freedom to choose evil, then neither would we have the freedom of choosing to truly love.</div>
<div>______________________</div>
<h2><span style="font-size: xx-small;">*As an aside, &#8220;the problem of evil&#8221; is often used as an attack on faith.  However, evil is an even bigger problem for the atheist than it is for the Christian.  When we posit that there is real evil, we also assume that there is real good.  But this distinction requires a real, objective moral law on the basis of which to differentiate between good and evil.  This moral law must have a source, and that source is God, as it is absurd to think that humanity would ever develope such a universal, innate moral compass by chance.  Thus the problem of evil does more to bolster the claim for God than to dispel it.</span></h2>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blackwhiteforum.com/2010/08/if-god-created-everything-did-he-create-evil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Birth Control Biblical?</title>
		<link>http://blackwhiteforum.com/2010/07/is-birth-control-biblical/</link>
		<comments>http://blackwhiteforum.com/2010/07/is-birth-control-biblical/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 14:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>B&#38;W Forum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Christian Living]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackwhiteforum.com/?p=182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Q. I know this is a controversial issue, but what does the Bible say about birth control?  Is this an instance where we must listen to our God-given conscience because there is no direct instruction on the matter? &#8211; We Are To Multiply In order to gain a context for the answer to this somewhat [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><strong>Q. I know this is a controversial issue, but what does the Bible say  about birth control?  Is this an instance where we must listen to our  God-given conscience because there is no direct instruction on the  matter?</strong><br />
&#8211;</h3>
<h3>We Are To Multiply</h3>
<p>In order to gain a context for the answer to this somewhat controversial topic in question, we immediately need to be pushed back to Genesis 1:28 <em>&#8220;Then God blessed them, and God said to them, &#8216;Be fruitful and multiply, fill the earth&#8230;&#8221; </em>So what is the obvious point that God is making in this verse?  <strong>We are to procreate as human beings, as creations of God.</strong></p>
<p>There may be some random passages which  speak about mismanaging a sanctioned opportunity to procreate like the  strange account of Onan in Genesis 38:9-10, but that seems to be  addressing a specific failure to continue a generational family line.</p>
<h3>God Values Embryos As Life</h3>
<p>Abortion as birth control is obviously forbidden, as well as something  like the &#8220;morning after pill&#8221; because they both tamper with a developing  child already conceived (see Exodus 21:22 &#8220;If men fight, and hurt a woman  with child, so that she gives birth prematurely&#8230;&#8221;  Notice the woman is  referred to as being<em> with child</em>).  Psalm 139:16 says &#8220;Your eyes  saw my substance, being yet unformed&#8230;&#8221; (<em>my substance, being yet  unformed</em> is all one word in the Hebrew: golem &#8211; something rolled  together, an embryo, a fetus. The interlinear actually reads:<em> &#8220;My embryo saw your  eyes&#8221;</em>).  So we can see that God has great respect for the pre-born,  biological development of a human being, which He calls a child.</p>
<h3>Silence On The Subject</h3>
<p>There doesn&#8217;t seem to be any specific, technical mention about birth control in the Bible. So, while avoiding the problems mentioned above, it seems that <strong>God leaves things up to the discretion of the couple.</strong> Medically speaking, when making the decision to decide on the right birth control pill, a married couple should do research to make sure that the pill chosen does not tamper in any way with an already conceived embryo. That would be the Biblical thing to do.</p>
<p>This is just one&#8217;s humble opinion. Do your own research, formulate your own conclusions, and pray that God will give you insight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blackwhiteforum.com/2010/07/is-birth-control-biblical/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Does Biblical Modesty For Women Look Like Today?</title>
		<link>http://blackwhiteforum.com/2010/07/what-does-biblical-modesty-for-women-look-like-today/</link>
		<comments>http://blackwhiteforum.com/2010/07/what-does-biblical-modesty-for-women-look-like-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>B&#38;W Forum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Christian Living]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackwhiteforum.com/?p=179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Q. I have been wondering what reasonable boundaries should be for modesty in today&#8217;s society.  I know the Bible says that it&#8217;s better for a woman to be Godly instead of being more concerned with expensive clothing and makeup, but what about swimming suits and stuff?  If I know that my guy classmates are tempted [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Q. I have been wondering what reasonable boundaries should be for modesty in today&#8217;s society.  I know the Bible says that it&#8217;s better for a woman to be Godly instead of being more concerned with expensive clothing and makeup, but what about swimming suits and stuff?  If I know that my guy classmates are tempted visually, why should I wear a bikini?  That&#8217;s not helping them out.  I guess I just need some clarification about what the Bible says.  Thanks.</h3>
<p>Great question!  This is one that many of us ladies ask at one point or another in our spiritual journey… especially if we live in warm climates!  As we grow in our Christian faith, we begin to look at others and their needs and as a result, these types of questions arise…</p>
<p>First, let’s look at Romans 12:9-11-<em>“Let love be without hypocrisy.  Abhor what is evil.  Cling to what is good.  Be kindly affectionate to one another with brotherly love, in honor giving preference to one another, not lagging in diligence, fervent in spirit, serving the Lord…” </em></p>
<p>What a great passage on the way we are to treat one another!</p>
<ul>
<li> <em>“Let love be without hypocrisy”</em> – remember <strong>love is not a feeling but an action/choice to put another person’s needs above your own.</strong> It could be defined as “a self-less humble service to meet another’s need no matter how lowly the service or how undeserving the person served.  It is a willful, joyful desire to put others over yourself, your feelings, your desires, your ambitions, etc”.  (1 Corinthians 13:1-7)</li>
<li> <em>“Abhor what is evil.  Cling to what is good”</em> – <strong>Bikinis are not evil.  In fact, no piece of clothing is evil</strong>… but as you said, the response it prompts in the hearts of some is evil (Romans 14:14-16).  This verse reminds us that we are to pursue what is good over what is evil.</li>
<li> <em>“Be kindly affectionate to one another with brotherly love… giving preference to one another”</em> – <strong>We are to treat every other believer like a family member</strong>… these are the people we look out for the MOST!  We are to prefer others over ourselves.  (Philippians 2:3-4)</li>
</ul>
<p>That being said, let’s look at the principles of <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Christian Liberty</span> (Romans 14:1-15:13, 1 Corinthians 10:23-30)</p>
<p>1 Corinthians 10:23- <em>All things are lawful for me, but not all things are helpful; all things are lawful for me  but not all things edify.</em></p>
<p>In Paul’s day, the argument in the Christian world wasn’t about bikinis but about whether or not it was sinful to eat meat that had been sacrificed to idols in the pagan temples.  Ex-pagans who were now Christians thought it was a horribly sinful practice whereas ex-jewish Christians realized it was yummy meat and not a big deal.  Kind of like today; some Christians have no problem whatsoever wearing bikinis while other Christians really struggle with the idea because it’s a temptation to their brothers.  Let’s briefly look at 4 principles from 1 Corinthians 10:23-30</p>
<ol>
<li> <strong>It is better to build up (“edify”) someone else than to gratify yourself (make yourself feel good) (v23)</strong></li>
<li><strong> Put others over self- this is a no-brainer and a key to the Christian life (Philippians 2:3-4).  We are always to prioritize the needs of others over our own desires and needs (v24)</strong></li>
<li><strong> Beware of legalism – following rules for the sake of rules – bikinis are not sinful, they are pieces of clothing and we must beware that we don’t have a legalistic attitude about them. (v25-27)</strong></li>
<li><strong> It is better to limit your “freedom” as a Christian in order to protect another Christian than it is to fit in with nonbelievers (v28-30)</strong></li>
</ol>
<p>Remember that we need to love others and put their needs above our own in everything we do… in our speech, in our attitudes, in our time, in our financial giving… and yes, even in our dress.</p>
<p>Galatians 5:13 -<em> For you, brethren, have been called to liberty; only do not use liberty as an opportunity for the flesh, but through love serve one another. </em></p>
<p>Romans 14:15 &#8211; <em>Yet if your brother is grieved because of your food, you are no longer walking in love. Do not destroy with your food the one for whom Christ died.</em> [for this question, translate “food” as “clothing”]</p>
<p>If you know that wearing “revealing” clothing causes your Christian brothers to stumble into sin and temptation (Romans 14:21) and your conscience is telling you that it’s wrong, then you have to follow what your conscience is saying and “limit your liberty” to wear certain things in order to protect your brother in Christ.  However, we always must be careful not to condemn others if their conscience does not tell them something is wrong (Romans 14:3)</p>
<p>Remember, our goals are always to love and serve others… we can always measure these types of issues by asking “am I showing love to my brothers and sisters if I do ___________?” or “am I serving others if I do ________ or am I serving myself?”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blackwhiteforum.com/2010/07/what-does-biblical-modesty-for-women-look-like-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If Adam And Eve Were Perfect, How Did They Sin?</title>
		<link>http://blackwhiteforum.com/2010/07/if-adam-and-eve-were-perfect-how-did-they-sin/</link>
		<comments>http://blackwhiteforum.com/2010/07/if-adam-and-eve-were-perfect-how-did-they-sin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>B&#38;W Forum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bible]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackwhiteforum.com/?p=176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Q. How is man able to sin prior to the fall? In the Bible it calls Adam and Eve perfect but then they go and sin, does that mean even in a perfect state man sins? If God is also perfect can he sin? Human beings are engineered, within this life, with the way we [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Q. How is man able to sin prior to the fall? In the Bible it calls Adam and Eve perfect but then they go and sin, does that mean even in a perfect state man sins? If God is also perfect can he sin?</h3>
<p>Human beings are engineered, within this life, with the way we are made at this time, to be able to sin.  Romans 5:12 &#8220;Therefore, just as through one man sin entered the world&#8230;&#8221;  God created people with the capacity to choose, part of the being &#8220;made in the image and likeness of God&#8221;.  Most people are very positive about possessing this ability to choose, even if it can get us into trouble.  Which it has.  But the ability to choose is the preferred design for humanity, not a pre-programed ability to always make the correct choice (like a machine, a robot).  <strong>So even though Adam and Eve were perfect, they possessed the ability to disobey and become imperfect, because of their humanness.</strong></p>
<p>The biblical solution seems to be, obtain a regenerated spirit (Ephesians 2:1, theologians view our human spirits as the part of us being made alive), achieve a transformed mind (Romans 12:2), and then one day, become privileged with a newly designed body, a resurrected body (1Co 15:42 &#8220;So also is the resurrection of the dead.  The body is sown in corruption, it is raised in incorruption.&#8221;)  Having a resurrected body, seems to be the final step in the path to perfection (1Co 15:53).  <em>Practical</em> perfection, not <em>positional</em> perfection which we receive at the moment of salvation (Colossians 2:10 &#8220;and you are complete in Him&#8230;&#8221;  &#8216;complete&#8217;  pleroo  full, complete, perfect)</p>
<p><strong>God is Spirit and does not have a mortal human body like ours (John 4:24), and therefore has never possessed the capacity to sin.</strong> When He did become incarnate through Jesus, as Jesus, (1Tim 3:16  &#8220;God was manifested in the flesh&#8221; NKJV ), Deity dominated and the incarnate God could not and did not sin (Hebrews 4:15 &#8220;For we do not have a High Priest who cannot sympathize with our weaknesses, but was in all points tempted as we are, yet without sin&#8217;.).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blackwhiteforum.com/2010/07/if-adam-and-eve-were-perfect-how-did-they-sin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

